Thursday, April 1, 2010

World War 2 Combat Medics




World war two was a dark and horrific time for most. If you weren't on the front line you were a worried family member back at home. Most families lost someone in World War 2, and some who were able to get home safe owe alot of thanks to the secret heros behind it all. The combat medics. Combat Medics were trained medical personnel who were to aid to the injured, wounded, or traumatized soilders on the front line. Combat medics were signified with a red cross on a white band or on a hat. The medics carried supplies and morphiene to help the wounded soilders. Because the Medics were constantly in the line of fire Eurpoeans started the Geneva Convention to save lives of the wounded and their aiding personnel. Medics and wounded soilders were not allowed to be shot at because they were non combatic. To make matters worse medics had no protection in the line of fire. Most only had a knife or a small hand gun. How were these men so brave enough to run through line of fire and have the strength to hold someones life in their hands? We always think of the trauma war veterans face after war and all the trauma that takes place. Do we ever really think about the war medics? These brave people were the ones picking up and holding down the bodies of their best friends as they take their last breaths. They are behind the scenes of the actual pain and hardship. '
'I can never describe the feeling you get when you see your closest friend dead from his wounds, and knowing that you were unable to save his life. But it has one advantage, you learn not to become to close to anyone, because the pain is to deep when it was a friend who had died. You have to remove every emotion in your body, or end up a raving madman. No one can ever understand that unless they themselves lived it.'' Albert Gentile, Aid-Man for Company B, 333rd Infantry, 84th Infantry Division, WWII. This quote struck me when I read it, it made me feel upset to know real men had to go through this. I could never imagine going through something that traumatizing. Later in his speech he says in all the history books it never says anything about what the war medics had to deal with. Its always the war heros! To me and I think most of you people should feel the true heros are not only the ones who fought but the ones who then had to have the power to pick up the ''strong man'' off the ground and have the mind strength of not knowing if this one will die in your arms or not. Combat medics were inncoent people not wanting to fight in the actual war, but to simply help. I hate to say it even though there was a rule that states you were not aloud to aim fire at a medic or wounded soilder many men were heartless enough to do it anyway. These deffensless, traumatized, strong, innocent, caring men were actually sometimes ''murdered.'' These brave men were the true heros of the war, not only were they saving lives, but they were risking their own for another man.

10 comments:

  1. Combat medics are very much heros. I think every soldier, cook, medic, and the many other people who make the war possible to fight are hero's too. I do think that it is very bad to kill an unarmed person, but if civilians can be considered an enemy, than I don't think it will stop someone from killing an unarmed military personel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Shane. Medics are a part of military. Before they went into war, they knew exactly what they were signing up for. If they are a part of the army, and as you said, carried a knife or a small hand gun, they are considered armed. That gives the enemy a good enough excuse to take the medics out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree with your argument. Combat medics risked their own lives to save either their best friend or a stranger. They had unbelievable determination to save others and were truely heros.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like the positive spin that you put on your argument by glorifying the medics of WWII. They were so brave to go out and risk their lives to try and save someone elses, and that is definitely the ultimate sacrafice, and such a sign of bravery, compassion for other people, and loyalty to your country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ark, I disagree with your statement. I don't believe the men who signed up for the military, whether a soldier or medic or any other position, could have been prepared or even have a close understanding for what they were getting into. Really it seems to me you can't be prepared for any war, after all you can never know or predict what will happen and it can be far too traumatic for any person to handle, experienced or not. Also I don't believe that just because the medics had miniature weapons means the enemy should be able to take out the medics. The medics were there to help those who are injured from suffering under a lot of pain whether they were to live or die. They aren't going out there to kill but to help the ones unable to move quickly and/or are dying. I see the weapon they hold only as a gadget for self-defense and self-for assurance for safety, which is completely reasonable. How would you feel if you were out on a battle field, with the men next to you being shot, and you have no means of protection but your two fists?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes the medics deserve recognition for working in those horrific conditions. However, in your article you basically said that everyone else besides the medics are not true war heros. You deprived them of their erned glory. There are still those who turned back into open fire to try to save their buddies, or helped others escape prisons of war. It is not right to just disregard their brave and heroic efforts and achievements.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe that even if a medic is only carrying a small knife or a very small gun for his own protection, the enemy can or will see that and to the enemy you have a weapon which makes you a threat, so most likely carrying a weapon will just make you a target in a battlefield.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If I was fighting in WWll and approached a medic that was armed, I would not hesitate to fire at him. If the medics do not want to get shot, they should not be armed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, Mike, it is true that those who are armed are more likely to be considered a threat but, I don't think that medics go to war as medics so they wont get killed. They go as medics so won't have to kill anyone else. Going to war as a medic or not will always have death lingering in your future. There fore I think it's irrelevant to consider weather medic should be armed or not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I feel that combat medics are just as equal targets as soldiers. They knew what they were going to face before they went to war. At the same time, i would not kill one if we came face-to-face. If they were rushing the beach along with many other crowds of soldiers, it is not as bad as killing an unarmed medic just trying to help his men.

    ReplyDelete